Although I read Claire Tomalin’s biography of Jane Austen years ago and thought it was very good, I feel that historian Lucy Worsley’s book provides a more personal look at Austen with more detail about her everyday life. Although some references are drawn from Worsley’s knowledge of Georgian society, she doesn’t hesitate to draw inferences from Austen’s novels and letters. Further, I think she has a better sense than some biographers of when in Austen’s letters she is joking
Worsley points out how important a settled home is in Austen’s fiction. Certainly, from the time of her father’s retirement from Steventon, that is something she and her sister and mother did not have that provoked much anxiety.
It was Tomalin’s suggestion that Austen was unable to write when she was unsettled, but Worsley suggests that Austen was working on novels all along but not doing much to market them. She also pointed out some subversive ideas in Austen’s fiction that I never noticed despite how many times I’ve read the novels. In any case, she does a good job of showing how revolutionary Austen’s fiction was for her time.
What? Me Read? 
This sounds interesting. I haven’t read Tomalin’s biography, but I like the more personal sound of this book.
Yes. I enjoyed both, but this one seemed like it revealed Austen more.
Sounds interesting. Worsley shows up on TV here frequently doing sort of popular history programmes, and I’ve never taken to her on-screen persona which has made me avoid her books. But you’ve intrigued me! I may read this one and see if she works better for me in writing.
I kind of like her persona. She’s mischievous! That’s one reason I think she understands Austen’s humor better than Tomalin, maybe.