In the second novel of Highsmith’s Ripley series, Tom Ripley seems much more of a bumbler than in The Talented Mr. Ripley and the plot unnecessarily convoluted. In the first book, Highsmith succeeded in making us care about Ripley’s fate almost despite ourselves, but in Ripley Under Ground, Ripley’s troubles seem to be caused by hubris.
Ripley is living in France in his beautiful house with his wealthy wife Heloise at the beginning of the novel. He has done well from the death of Dicky Greenleaf but occasionally finds ways to raise a little extra cash.
One recurring source of money has been some businesses built around the work of a famous artist named Derwatt. The businesses are completely fraudulent, however, because Derwatt has been dead for five years. He committed suicide in Greece, and Buckmaster Gallery was originally opened to sell his paintings as an homage by his friends. His paintings were soon all sold, however, and it was Tom’s idea to “resurrect” him, as a recluse living in Mexico. Derwatt’s devoted friend Bernard Tufts has been painting forgeries ever since, to be sold by the gallery with a small token going to Ripley.
Gallery owner Jeff Constant contacts Ripley in a panic. Thomas Murchison, the American owner of a Derwatt, thinks his painting is a fake, and he is coming to the next Derwatt opening to speak to the gallery owners. In an attempt to bamboozle Murchison, who is planning on meeting with an art expert, Tom masquerades as Derwatt at the opening and assures Murchison that the painting in question is his. Murchison has some theory about the use of color in the painting, though, and is unconvinced, even ridiculously suggesting that Derwatt may not remember his own painting.
As himself, Tom meets Murchison in the lobby of his hotel and invites him to France to see his own Derwatts. Tom’s intention is simply to try to convince Murchison he is wrong about the painting, but of course he ends up having to murder him.
This starts us on a complicated series of events, where Tom buries the body then digs it up, confesses his murder to no less than four people, travels all over Europe looking for an errant Bernard, and is, of course, the number one suspect in Murchison’s disappearance. If this isn’t enough, while Tom is trying to cope with all these problems, people continually arrive on his doorstep and the phone rings at every inopportune moment. Ripley’s return is not an unqualified success from my point of view, as everything is over-complicated and the pace of the novel is too frenetic.
I became very interested in Patricia Highsmith since reading your last review but wasn’t sure where to start (the Ripley novels or her other ones). This is very helpful!
Hmm, if you don’t want to start with The Talented Mr. Ripley, then maybe try her most famous book, Strangers on a Train.
Yes, I may do that. My problem when it comes to books is that once I’ve seen the movie, I lose interest in reading the book! (I saw Matt Damon’s film a couple of years ago.)
The film is very good, probably better than the book. Certainly the film makes Ripley more likable and less at fault than he is in the book.
I went and got the biography of Patricia Highsmit — contrary to usual form, I think I might try that first, while the movie fades from memory.
I have a biography on order, too.
Yes! I finally read this, ( http://thepageaholic.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/art-attack-patricia-highsmith-ripley-under-ground/ ) and I was particularly bothered by the fact that he confesses his crimes to, like, pretty much anyone with ears, without much pressing. NOT talented mastermind behavior there.
Yes, sometimes I think we’re supposed to see these novels as sort of chillingly comic.
So that “talented” in Mister Ripley might have been subtly ironic..? He bumbles quite a bit…
Yes, he does!